2
0.0

百万碎片

导演:
萨姆·泰勒·约翰逊
主演:
亚伦·泰勒-约翰逊,查理·汉纳姆,比利·鲍伯·松顿,朱丽叶特·刘易斯,吉奥瓦尼·瑞比西,大卫·达斯马齐连,达什·米霍克,汤姆·阿曼德茨,安迪·麦肯济,奥黛莎·杨,Sean LoGrasso,Brad Berryhill,Deep Rai,Frederick Lawrence,Keith Barber
别名:
未知
0.0
2人评分
英语
语言
2018-09-10
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:
夫妻档亚伦·泰勒-约翰逊与萨姆·泰勒-约翰逊又要合作了,他们将把“臭名昭著”的畅销书、讲述吸毒“瘾君子”的《百万碎片》(A Million Little Pieces)拍成电影,计划丈夫出演、妻子导演。两人曾这样合作电影《无处的男孩》(并因此相恋)。《百万碎片》项目也很狗血:原作是James Frey写的书,卖得非常好,03年推出后就是各大电影公司争夺的目标,并在当年由华纳取得改编权,布拉德·皮特和詹妮弗·安妮斯顿、布拉德·格雷任制片人。  然而电影还没拍好,2006年Frey被曝出丑闻,这本市面上被归类为“自传”的书夹杂了很多不实信息,Frey对他的经历进行了修饰润色。此后Frey被批为“大骗子”,选这本书进入她创办的“奥普拉读书俱乐部”的主持人奥普拉·温弗瑞也称受到欺骗,电影项目也成了烫手山芋,几经波折。  但故事本身确实很引人入胜,讲述男主角在一架飞往芝加哥的飞机上醒来,随后开始进行康复治疗。书中对挣扎在吸毒、酗酒、犯罪中的人、绝望的人的展现和剖析让人震撼。

暂无片源

正在加载…

正在加载…

猜你喜欢
换一换
山重水复
2
0.0
山重水复
更新:08月12日
简介:故事梗概  1937年,党中央提出了"停止内战,一致抗日"的主张。陈毅带着党中央的指示来到卧虎岭,见到了在那里坚持敌后游击战的卧虎岭游击队司令员韩山河,传达了党中央关于建立抗日民族统一战线的指示,并要求游击队迅速改编为抗日队伍,为打败日本侵略者作出贡献。韩山河对这一新形势很不理解,认为和国民党合作就一定是下跪投降。于是,韩误认为陈毅是个大叛徒,指示部下把他捆起来。为了弄清陈毅"叛变"的底细,韩山河精心设计了一次"鸡宴",先让部下为陈毅松绑进而用规劝的方法让陈毅说出自己"叛变"的经过。陈毅理解韩山河的这些举动,没有责怪他,而是耐心地向韩山河讲明国共合作的重大意义。可是,韩山河拐不过弯来,双方僵持着。最后,他接受了陈毅的意见,派人拿着陈毅的名片下山去南昌找党组织联系。这时,蒋介石大耍反革命两面派,一面讲"国共合作",一面伺机消灭卧虎岭游击队。蒋介石派来的特务冯子焕不断制造事端,中伤陈毅,瓦解军心。韩山河果真以为陈毅所讲的全是叛党的道理,坚持要杀陈毅。在这当儿,冯子焕围剿卧虎岭的枪声打响了,韩山河为之一惊,率部还击敌人。在一场激烈的战斗结束后,通过血的教训,韩山河才明白陈毅的的确确是自己人,贯彻的是党中央的精神;而冯子焕正是顽固势力的代表者。他和游击队的全体官兵,在陈毅同志率领下,终于开赴到抗击日本帝国主义的最前线。  演员表  冯淳超 ...... 陈毅  白志迪 ...... 韩山河  胡朋 ...... 罗奶奶  鲍刚 ...... 牛仔  肖雄 ...... 赵之乔  康俊杰 ...... 张兆楼  刘晓明 ...... 马英才  许平 ...... 吴静石  李此江 ...... 高路  濮存晰 ...... 刘天祥  洪建涛 ...... 李元仔  陈文 ...... 憨仔  杨戈 ...... 刘老表  朱玉 ...... 甜妹  陈鹏 ...... 山仔  聂雅亮 ...... 冯子焕  王向明 ...... 赵之楠  杨子纯 ...... 胡凤熙  任伟民 ...... 杨国栋  顾岚 ...... 赵五龟  张惠明 ...... 孔琪  制作团队  导演  武兆堤  副导演  汪宜婉  编剧  丁一三  制片人  孙勇  摄影  王光麟  剪辑  严尚华  白志朴  李华  服装指导  于保年  董菊英  美术(制作设计)  莫克展  邵瑞刚  祖绍先  绘景  王新国  灯光(照明)  秦永利  烟火设计  陈加坤  置景  王国文  王春顺  王志敏  道具  武振山  高恕  指挥  韩中杰  作曲  娄彰后  录音师(收音)  王韵华  化妆  胡纯美  特技摄影  袁景业  音响  孙凯
2
1980
山重水复
欧洲的某个地方
1
0.0
欧洲的某个地方
更新:08月12日
简介:Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.  To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.  At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.  Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
1
1948
欧洲的某个地方